WOULD YOU CONVICT RICHARD HAMLIN ON SUSAN HAMLIN'S WORD?
by Virginia McCullough
Richard Hamlin and Susan Siemer met at the University of
the Pacific when both were attending the university's School of Law. Richard
Hamlin says that Susan made the difficult class work appear easy. In
protective custody in an El Dorado County jail awaiting a trial that could put
him away for 25 years to life, Richard reminisced. He recalled one particular
test that he had spent countless hours studying for determined to score a
higher grade then Susan - just this once. He said two-thirds of the way
through the test he glanced over at her and she had put down her pencil and
was staring off into space. She looked as though she did not have a care in
the world but he was worried that she had frozen and could not complete the
test. He need not have worried; Susan had simply finished the test before any
one else and was waiting for others to finish. As he described this event his
voice contained a mixture of pride and regret.
The early years of their marriage, like most young marriages, had been a
financial struggle with both of them working to make ends meet. Their first
son was born in 1987 and their second child, a boy, arrived in 1992. By this
time Richard Hamlin had left the Sacramento District Attorney's office and was
doing well as a defense attorney. With two children to care for, Susan decide
to become a stay at home mom and shortly thereafter in 1996 the Hamlin's
became the proud parents of a baby girl. Two years later, in 1998, a second
daughter was born and their family was complete. Their lives were filled with
business matters and social gatherings befitting a successful couple.
In the El Dorado County Sheriff's report made on February 26, 2004 Susan
Hamlin "said she started molesting her kids in Fresno in 1996 and that her dad
Sidney taught her how to put her kids in a "trance like hyper relaxed stage." She also said that "she last molested her kids in October, 2002". So by
Susan's own words she continued to molest her own children over a five year
period. In the audio recorded interview made of Susan Hamlin that same day
she was asked if her husband "ever molested one of your children" and she
answered, "No". She was again asked, "Are you positive of that?" and she
replied, "Yes."
The transcript of this same recorded interview shows Detective Hoagland asking
Mrs. Hamlin, "Does your husband ever beat you?" She replies, "No." Detective
Hoagland says, "Okay, I've got to ask." Susan acknowledges, "I know." Then
Detective Lensing explains, "One of the reasons why he's asking that is
because last time I talked to you, you had a black eye also. It was on the
left side. (inaudible) bruises..." Susan states, "I know, I know. I had
been roughed up by this..." Detective Lensing interjects, "This mysterious
guy...." And Susan concludes by naming the husband of her friend.
Richard recalled the first disturbing incident involving Susan that occurred
in 1999, although at the time Richard had thought the police officer who
issued his wife a misdemeanor child neglect/endangering citation (No. 539644,
Sacramento Municipal Court) had overreacted. Susan had taken the children
out shopping in their brown 1996 Ford van and had just run into the Pier One
import store in Sacramento for a few minutes to shop. It was a warm afternoon
on April 9, 1999 and fellow customers had observed the children crying in the
van. Concerned, they went into Pier One and reported the van's license
number and a description of the vehicle. Pier One clerks announced over the
store loud speaker that the parents of children in this locked van needed to
immediately report to the counter. Twenty minutes later when Susan checked
her products out at the cashier, she walked out to find the police trying to
open the van's doors to rescue the children. When she received the citation
from officer T. Taylor, Richard Hamlin appeared as his wife's defense
attorney. Susan plead nolo contendre (acknowledged by law to have
the same force and effect as a guilty plea.). She successfully completed a diversion program and the charges were dismissed on
April 13, 1999.
Richard noticed a marked difference in his wife. She seemed to have more
energy and was not as withdrawn, talking more openly then she had in years. Then in October of 2002 Susan suffered a panic attack that was worse then
anything that had happened in the past. She was driving in the van with the
children and she suddenly suffered from a severe migraine headache so painful
that she began experiencing breathing difficulties and temporary numbness in
her arm and face. She panicked and pulled off to the side of the road calling
911. The police responded, called Richard at work to come get the children
and took Susan to the hospital where they kept her for the day, medicating her
and sending her home later that evening. According to Richard, the attack
seemed to release some type of trigger in Susan and for the first time she
began telling Richard about her horrific childhood. And she began writing to
those friends and family who could explain the gaps in her memory that made
her feel as though she had been raised in a totally different household from
her siblings.
To her father, Dr. Sid Siemer she wrote the following letter on April 22,
2003:
Dear Dad,
This is a letter that I never thought I would choose to write. But, lately,
(the past 3-4 years) I have been struggling with behaviors and moods that I
can't explain. I have suffered from severe depression, thoughts of suicide,
self esteem problems, marital problems, problems socializing; in all
settings, including the work environment, etc. I have gone back and forth
between concern for, or more accurately, fear of, your feelings in reading
this letter and concern for my well being if I did not write, and send, this
letter. At this point, obviously, I have concluded that my need to
write this letter has sufficient
value. I have not yet, as I sit here writing, determined the value of my
need to send it. (If you are
reading this now, then I guess, not only do I have a need to verbalize my
thoughts, but I also have a need for you to hear them. Any need I have for
a response from you is a separate issue that I have not gotten to at this
point.)
I have so many gaps in my memory of growing up -- I have always wondered
why. Terri has similar gaps. Layne recounts memories that are so foreign
to me that I think he lived in another house. I have lived my life not ever
letting others see the "real" me. I know that everyone does this to a certain
extent. But I have always expended so much energy projecting an image of
someone who is "acceptable"..... always feeling that I had to hide
something. While I expended such energy to keep others from finding out
what was inside me -- it really wasn't hard to keep it hidden, since I had
no idea what it was that I was hiding.
I have been trying so hard to figure things out so that I can, at some
point, relax and let down enough to actually experience life, i.e., really
feel it -- expose myself so that I could really experience life's feelings,
instead of merely acting them out as I projected this more acceptable image
of Susan. While my protective walls, my facade, kept the true ugliness
safely hidden within, they have also unknowingly served to keep life out
too. As you will read in any psych textbook, intimacy in a relationship is
impossible to achieve without trusting another enough to let your true self
be seen, i.e. exposing yourself to a point of vulnerability. Love is what
results then, when in that vulnerability, you can draw strength from a
confidence that you will still be, at a minimum, accepted, but even more
than that (unbelievably so), affirmed and clung to still, i.e., loved.
Isn't that the cliché --"unconditional love?"
In my case, exposing the grotesque ugliness that was me, so I thought, could
only lead to being cast aside, abandoned, discarded, rejected, shunned,
isolated...unloved. The results, of course was ZERO self esteem. How could
I have possibly had any good thoughts of myself if disgust and disapproval
were a certainty upon someone seeing behind my facade. Perfection of this
facade as I went though childhood, then, was a necessity for my very
survival, since dependent children would surely perish if abandoned. While
this facade served me well, for the most part, in hiding the ugliness that I
have always believed to be me, it is now hurting me, and those I love, much
more than any good it is doing. It is affecting every relationship I have
with those people in my life -- my husband, my children, my siblings, my
friends, any employer I have ever had,.....and you. This facade has
outlived its usefulness in my life; unfortunately, however, it has taken on
a life of its own. It is going to protect
me whether or not I need or want it to. How do I turn it off? What was its
source? Why is it so STRONG? About 4 or 5 years ago I remember thinking
that I was finally happy with my life. For the most part, I felt
comfortable with who I was -- I thought I had a healthy image of myself at
long last. I had absolutely no desire to focus any attention backward in an
attempt to figure out any baggage I might be carrying through life. I was
happy and unaffected by any "baggage".
This feeling of peace lasted for a couple of years. Then I started into a
plunge that went deeper than anything I had previously experienced --e.g.,
the break-up of the family, Mom's suicide attempt and problems with alcohol,
her death, post-partum depression, etc. Thoughts of suicide were not
unfamiliar to me over the years, but the depth and intensity of this
particular period of severe depression really scared me. I remember on a
couple of different occasions crying to Rick to please watch me closely --
I was afraid of what I might do. It was, at that time, not just others'
disapproval that was so devastating, it was that I couldn't even love
myself. I was too "ugly" even for me to approve of. I thought I would be
doing my family a favor if I died. I thought Rick should have someone
better, and I thought, if I were dead, my kids would benefit from the
absence of such a negative influence in their lives. This feeling of
despair was so consuming and very scary. I really don't think it is a
feeling that someone can empathize with if they have not experienced it.
The healthy response, of course, would be "snap out of it". But isn't that
like saying to a painfully shy person (as I was) "just don't be shy". It
really wasn't a self centered wallowing in self pity. I think I would have
fared much better if I could have been self centered -- at least that would
indicate some sense of self that I was worth even that much concern.
Thankfully, something kept me from totally succumbing to despair and
actually taking my life. And as the fight inside me slowly came back, I
figured there must be something I needed to figure out. I didn't know how
to frame the questions, though. And I knew that if I didn't ask the
right questions, there would be no way of coming up with the right answer.
I spent a lot of time spinning my wheels trying to find answers to the wrong
questions. I was continuously frustrated when discovering the answer to
my questions failed to produce any change in my emotional health. I have
been to counselors, I have read books, I have talked to people, I have spent
time just trying to figure something out. I thought that the discovery that
I have held this "ugly" image of myself all these years would, by itself, be
so liberating. It was not just other people's approval that had such power
over me, it was also my own and that, finally, was something that I had
control of -- or so it seemed. That it took me until mid life to figure out
what seems so simple did nothing to bolster my self esteem, but I guess I'm
OK with being a late bloomer. What really bothered me was that I was
ineffective at changing my self image , even with conscious effort. As I
tried unsuccessfully several different ways to "undo" this disabling self
image, it occurred to me that before I could undo it, I needed to know where
it originated. I started to re-phrase the initial questions. What was it
about me that, if it were discovered, would be so repulsive to others that I
would certainly be cast out? This is more than just being "self
conscious". My ugliness must be kept hidden at any cost. When did this
need to cover arise? Where did it come from? I still haven't answered these
starting point questions. So, very shortly after concluding that I needed
to take this journey, my trip has stalled out. So now what? Well, maybe if
I tackled it from another side first, instead of so directly, I might at
least be able to get a start. (More my style anyway.) I started looking
again at memories that I do have, instead of racking my brain trying to
remember something that I don't remember.
One memory that I never really gave a second thought to in the past, but
that has begun to cause more concern for me lately, is one that you could
shed some light on for me. I don't need help reconstructing the memory --
that has always been very clear in my mind. What I do have a problem
figuring out, as only you would know, is why it took place, whether it was
an isolated event, and why nothing has ever been said about it. When I was
16, J-------- L ---- and I planned to take a day trip to the beach. We
planned to leave early in the morning so she spent the night at our house.
We slept on the floor in the living room so we wouldn't wake everyone else
so early. During the night I woke up, rolled over and saw you sitting
beside J ------ . I immediately felt awkwardness and said "you guys are
being weird". J---- did not say anything, but you said, "Roll over and go
back to sleep". I did as I was told. I don't remember thinking anything
else about it that night or the next morning. It wasn't until J---- and I
were driving home from the beach the next evening that it was raised by
J----. She told me that she had not wanted to say anything earlier because
she didn't want to ruin our day, but she wanted to ask me something. She
told me that you came in to where we were sleeping the night before and
started rubbing her breasts. She didn't know what to do at the time, or
what to think. She was confused and felt very awkward, as did I. She asked
me if that was something that you did to me to help me get to sleep at
night. I don't know if she asked that because it was something you told
her, or if she was trying to explain it in some way that could make some
sense. My response was a very embarrassed "no". But I knew that was what
was going on when I woke up during the night when I said the two of you were
acting weird. I was so extremely embarrassed, confused, and deeply hurt and
affected in ways that I couldn't begin to know. I can only guess about the
resulting impact on J-----. We never spoke of this incident again beyond
this one brief conversation. As far as I know, you never explained or
apologized to J----. I don't have any memory of you raising it in any way
with me either. WHY? Because of your failure to address it, I was left
with my own assumptions and their resulting impact. (As was J----.) I was
hurt to the core by my assumption that my dad didn't love me --how could he
love me if his actions evidenced a total disregard for any feelings I might
have. When I woke up and said something, your dismissal of me made me feel
like I didn't matter at all. And when you didn't say anything the next day,
or ever, it just confirmed that you didn't care. Were you concerned at all
that J---- and I might talk, or that she might tell her parents? It was a
crime you know. She was my best friend for all those years --I can't
remember if she ever spent the night at my house again after that, all our
friendship was affected, or if her suicide attempt was linked. I have
thought about writing her, but thought I should start with you. A big thing that
has come to me lately is why, with a clear memory of that night, I have
thought of it as insignificant all this time. Looking at it differently now
may be because C---- is at the age of spending the night at friends' houses
now.
So, all of a sudden, I had a need to write this letter. As I have been
writing this for the last week or two, I have been immobilized by severe
depression. My body has shut down. I don't drive without literally falling
asleep at the wheel. I am freezing cold all the time and crying at the drop
of a hat. What does this all mean??? I don't feel anger at all towards
you. Perhaps that is odd -- Rick thinks that is odd. He definitely feels
angry -- maybe it is a guy thing, or maybe the field he works in, or maybe
feelings of a protective husband. But where is my protective daddy??? My
feelings started being piqued as C---- is getting older. But I was your
baby -- what about that? This is my only memory so I am not making any
accusations beyond what I clearly remember. But in my pain as an adult, I
have to ask the questions -- did you sexually molest me as a child?? Is
that why I have so few memories of growing up? I know that must a horribly
painful question to be asked. But it is just as painful, if not more so, to
be asking it. As I said earlier, I feel no anger at all, only extreme pain
and a desperate need for healing. If you can help me heal, as your baby
still, won't you please answer my questions with loving honesty? I am a
wreck and, at this point, just trying to survive.
Your baby,
Susan
Susan Hamlin had told her father that her husband
Richard was angry over the disclosures she was making to him on an almost
daily basis. There was clear evidence that this was true. Richard encouraged
Susan to act on her newly emerging memories and to contact her old friends and
relatives in an attempt to establish the truth about her past. Susan did so
and Richard researched the past of his father-in-law, Dr. Sid Siemer. In
his own mind, Richard said he believed his wife and mother of his children had
been and continued to be violated by her own father. He believed it because
his wife was verifying it in letters and emails she sent to others and because
she maintained a detailed journal in which she documented the abuse in her own
handwriting. As his anger and determination grew Richard began contacting
the friends, family and associates of Dr. Siemer bringing the confrontation
right to the Fresno community where Dr. Siemer lived and worked. These acts
culminated in Richard Hamlin producing and distributing a flyer that
identified Dr. Sid Siemer as a serial child molester.
Dr. Siemer's response was immediate and forceful. On Thursday, July 3rd,
2003 Susan's father filed a lawsuit (Case No. 03CECG02378, Fresno County
Superior Court). The lawsuit was a petition for injunction prohibiting
harassment and an application for a temporary restraining order. Attorney
Susan Hamlin defended her husband in the action filed by her father. Judge
Pena signed the show cause order as requested on July 13, 2003 and the proof
of service was served on Richard W. Hamlin by personal service on August 3,
2003.
On August 10, 2003 Susan Hamlin wrote another letter to her father. This
letter contained an entirely different tone; it is a missive filled with a
cold, controlled anger and "Dad" is now Sid.
August 10, 2003
Sid,
Since we just found your motion for a restraining order in the bushes
when we got home last night, it prompted me to re-read the letter I wrote
you in April? which, I might add, you so ?lovingly? attached as an exhibit
to be included as a public record. After reading it, it dawned on me that,
what was glaringly obvious to all but you, had been omitted. In all
fairness to you, I feel compelled to clarify this written record that you
are so meticulously compiling. You truly thought that you had me willingly
in your web? that I knowingly chose to participate in your repulsively
deviant little ?games? of torture and control. I just couldn't let the
record stand if there was any possibility of confusion on this issue. So? to be very clear? YOU NEVER HAD ME. That my body was forced to
participate, from my very beginning, and continuing on until April of this
year, in acts so unbearable that, in order to survive (quite literally)
things that were so against nature, my mind had to immediately delete all
traces of each event that it sorted into this category. As supremely
intelligent as you think you are, your plan had a fatal flaw? you either
had no knowledge of ?repressed memories?, or, more likely, you were aware
of such a? theory? and decided that? it was all a bunch of ? hog-wash??.
The latter sounds like you doesn't it? Well? here is a news flash for you,
the fact that Sid Siemer doesn't believe in something does not mean that it
doesn't exist in reality. The first clue you had was in your kitchen
when I mentioned that I had so many gaps in my memories of childhood. We
were specifically talking about when we lived on Colonial? I was in
junior high and high school. You got such an odd look on your face.
You were studying my expression to see if I was just stupid, or if I was
doing a really good job of playing along with? the secret?. I was
really convincing, wasn't I? You were worried for only a second though, and
recovered very well with your comment about Mom's ?multiple? suicide
attempts during that period in my life. Of course I would want to put
those little unpleasantness out of my mind, you told me. The problem
is that the version of the family myth that I was told was limited to only
one such attempt? and, now even that is in question since I have recently
learned that, upon her release from the hospital a day or two later, she
went to the YWCA ?a shelter for abused women, where she stayed for
approx...2 weeks.
And all the while I kept remembering more and more....
And did I tell you how glad I am that you have been so predictable.
That you would take this private little matter to court gives me the
opportunity I have wanted. In court, when you are asked questions, there
will be a judge presiding to see to it that you answer. Oh, did your
lawyers tell you that the judge has power over even YOU. The judge, of
course, does expect you to tell the truth. Can you lie convincingly to an
adult? How about to an adult with power over you? In any event, I expect
nothing from the noise that will come out of your mouth. I do, however,
look forward to watching you try to control yourself when Rick cross-examines you. I think I'll bring my camera.
Your choice of forums for our first opportunity to discuss this? secret?
matter is very PUBLIC. Since this is your motion, you are obviously not
concerned about publicity. I welcome it. Newspapers, TV and radio could
find this to be quite a human interest story. Just wanted to thank you in
advance in case I forget to in court. I am, however, wondering what has
suddenly changed to make exposure of your ugly secret no longer life
ending. Or is it that you think if you tell the story first, control
remains yours since you can decided which version to tell. Convincing the
court that one person is crazy is not impossible, however, it is also not
easy. Convincing the court that all the witnesses are crazy is ridiculous. So, I'm looking forward to a good show.
What do you think people will think of you when they learn what you did
to me to make sure I never told anyone that you raped me repeatedly
throughout my childhood? The acts of rape were horrific, but you were able
to trump even that. Your acts of cruelty and torture were effective control
tactics with me, the cornerstone of which was to teach me [my place]. That,
I did learn. I had the same value to you as did any other animal, no more,
and no less. Animals are kept around only so long as they continue to
please the master. But because this animal can speak, unpredictability
exists? you can never really be sure what they might just ?blurt out?. Control is what defines master, and control cannot exist where there is
unpredictability. You used a demonstration to accomplish this. My puppy
that I so loved was the subject of your demonstration on that day? do you
remember? While holding her over the bathtub by the scruff of her neck, you
took your jagged edged fishing knife from its leather case and sliced open
her abdomen allowing her insides to run out into the tub. I got it. I
understood that lesson and acted very predictably for a couple of years. It
is hard for me to believe that I would have ever needed to be reminded of
this lesson. Unfortunately, with my limited life experience at age 7, I
didn't know that I was telling? the secret? when I complained of severe pain
during urination. Going [potty] wasn't the secret. Of course, what I
couldn't know was that painful urination resulting from forced intercourse
did expose the secret. This demonstration was more personally tailored.
You tied me, naked and in a spread eagle position, on top of the table in
the Adams St. house and, with your fishing knife, threatened to cut me as
you had my puppy when we lived in Richmond.
It is no wonder to me anymore that I submitted to your control. It also
now makes sense that I remained under your control well after becoming an
adult since you never released me from your hold (i.e. the childhood lessons
remained controlling). My survival of my past, however, is due to a coping
mechanism which spared my child mind from remembering trauma which would
have been too great to bare. This served as a life preserver which,
thankfully, kept me afloat until I was strong enough to deal with the
memories. I was sent a rescuer - Rick. Rick is my hero. Contrary to the
propaganda that you have spread all these years, Rick is a good man. He has
endured a lot as a result of your actions over the years, directly and
indirectly as your distorted teachings come to him through me. I found
myself acting on auto-pilot in ways that I was committed to changing, and I
didn't know why. Until I remembered the distorted lessons that you taught
me, I could not release myself from their controlling effect on my life.
It makes me retch to think that you actually believed that I would ever
choose you. You have robbed me of my childhood, my innocence, my trust, my
history, and more. But it stops now. You will not take anything more from
me. My present and my future are mine.
The revelations disclosed to her husband, her family
members and several long time friends finally led to someone severely beating
Susan Hamlin on or about February 22, 2004. The location of the beating and
the identification of the person who beat Richard Hamlin's wife is what the
upcoming trial is all about. When Susan and Richard Hamlin went to the El
Dorado County Sheriff's Office on Thursday, February 26, 04 at 5:35 p.m. Susan
twice identified the perpetrator as most likely the husband of a friend that
she had agreed to meet in the parking lot of a nearby Starbucks Coffee Shop. In this very public place, in broad daylight, this man punched her in the face
knocking her to the ground where he proceed to "kick her all over her head and
body ", she told the deputy sheriffs. Susan stated this once in front of her
husband and a second time on tape when she was alone with the deputies in a
private room. Yet she claimed to have never met her friend's husband. She
only assumed it was him because he arrived in a red car that was the same make
and model as one of the cars owned by her friend. It was her married
girlfriend who Susan said had set up the Starbuck's meeting location.
That evening the El Dorado County deputy sheriffs ordered the Hamlin children
placed in Child Protective Services to remove them from harm's way. The next
day Richard Hamlin was arrested and immediately Susan Hamlin retracted
everything contained in her confession and stated that her husband was the
individual who had beat her and, over a period of time, had tortured her. Sources now say that Susan Hamlin and her children have been reunited with her
family and her father.
Individuals who wish to remain unidentified have said that Dr. Sid Siemer is a
high ranking member of a CIA sanctioned child molestation ring called "The
Finders" and also a senior member of the Order of the Trapezoid, consisting of
worshippers of the Temple of Set. Members of both groups have indicated that
they consider themselves a type of royalty operating above the laws of man.
Richard Hamlin, former Sacramento County prosecutor and high profile defense
lawyer is now held without bail facing the following serious felony
complaints: (1) causing cruelty and pain and suffering with great bodily
injury to Susan Hamlin , (2) two counts of corporal injury to a
spouse/cohabitant/former cohabitant/child's parent, (3) willful and unlawful
discharge of a firearm in a grossly negligent manner which could result in
injury and death of a person, (4) willfully and unlawfully threatening to
commit a crime which could result in death or great bodily injury to Susan
Hamlin with specific intent that the statement be taken as a threat, (5)
terrorist threats - threaten to commit a crime that could cause death or
great bodily injury to Susan Hamlin with the specific intent that the
statement be taken as a threat, and (6) three counts of child abuse under
circumstances likely to produce great bodily harm and death (he) did cause and
permit a child to suffer unjustifiable physical pain or mental suffering to be
placed in such situation that his/her person or health may be endangered.
The prosecutor offered a plea agreement to Richard Hamlin that required
Hamlin serve 12 years in prison. Hamlin rejected the plea offer and prepared to go to trial
to try to prove his innocence.
The Hamlin case reminds one of an ABC television interview of Princess Diane
on November 24, 1995. The commentator asked the Princess, "Do you think
Camellia Parker-Bowles was a factor in the breakdown of your marriage (to
Prince Charles)"?
Princess Diane responded, "Well, there were three of us in the marriage and it
was a bit crowded."
Could it be that Princess Diane and Richard Hamlin both served the same
purpose - breeders to "royalty"?
by Virginia McCullough © March 10, 2005
Click.
RICHARD
WILLIAM HAMLIN ON TRIAL
THE BEST CONSPIRACY LITIGATION IN CALIFORNIA
by Virginia McCullough
Superior Court of California, Fresno County
by Virginia McCullough
Click.
OPENING STATEMENTS IN
Click.
WAS THERE
A PLOT TO MURDER
Click
SIDNEY SIEMER vs. RICHARD W. HAMLIN
Click.
WOULD YOU CONVICT RICHARD HAMLIN
Click.
MICHAEL RICONOSCIUTO EXPLAINS WHY HIS TESTIMONY IS ESSENTIAL IN
Click. RICHARD HAMLIN CONVICTED OF TORTURE. VERDICT CARRIES LIFE
SENTENCE 1/10/06
Richard describes Susan as a brilliant, strong willed woman who is beautiful
and petite but tall and slender with a model's figure. In law school they
shared an interest in religion and attended church regularly. Richard Hamlin
was not just attracted to his fellow student, he was in love. In 1984 they
were married. It seemed an ideal match. She was a smart civil litigator
whose expertise was writing well researched civil complaints; he was a
confrontational trial lawyer who rapidly acquired experience as a prosecutor
and then as a defense attorney. Together they appeared to live an ideal
Christian life responsibly raising four children and building a million dollar
home with a view in El Dorado Hills halfway between the capital city of
California, Sacramento, and the historic smaller town of Placerville. Their
neighbors describe a couple who were devoted parents who both participated in
after school activities and church gatherings. Susan Hamlin was a stay-at-home mother whose husband's income allowed her to have a gardener and
housekeeper to help her run their large home. Observers said that for
eighteen years it seemed to be a perfect marriage and both parents were excellent
role models for their children.
Following this 1999 event, Susan began shutting down and withdrawing into
herself and hardly ever speaking. Richard became concerned about the possibility
that Susan was suffering from depression. He admits that he was not the best
husband during this time period, concentrating only on money and providing his
family and himself with the very best of material things. He said he had a
very profitable practice and when it reached its peak in 2001 he was making
$650,000 a year as a defense attorney. He was defending some very high
profile clients who could afford to keep him on 24-hour call by paying him
what ever was needed to defend their clients. He was hobnobbing with
powerful politicians, sampling the good life and having an occasional extramarital affair if he had the desire. He acknowledges that during this
crucial time he was paying little attention to the emotional needs of his
family and Susan became quieter and more withdrawn. Finally, Susan went to a
psychiatrist at Kaiser Hospital in Sacramento who first prescribed Ritalin and
later Prozac which Susan took for several years.
vmccullough@comcast.net
SIDNEY SIEMER vs. RICHARD W. HAMLIN
[Appearing as defense counsel, attorney
Susan Siemer Hamlin]
Click
Case No. 03CEGC02378
THE
RICHARD HAMLIN TRIAL
RICHARD HAMLIN?
ON SUSAN HAMLIN'S WORD?
Click.
RICHARD
WILLIAM HAMLIN ON TRIAL
THE CASES
OF RICHARD HAMLIN AND
PHILIP ARTHUR THOMPSON
Click. THE RICHARD HAMLIN TRIAL -
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE OR TORTURE?